combine@alvar.ug

Relationships between test positivity rate, total laboratory confirmed cases of malaria, and malaria incidence in high burden settings of Uganda: An ecological analysis

Relationships between test positivity rate, total laboratory confirmed cases of malaria, and malaria incidence in high burden settings of Uganda: An ecological analysis

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Jaffer Okiring
dc.contributor.author Epstein A
dc.contributor.author Namuganga Jf
dc.contributor.author null Kamya
dc.contributor.author Sserwanga A
dc.contributor.author James Kapisi
dc.contributor.author Ebong C
dc.contributor.author Kigozi Sp
dc.contributor.author Mpimbaza A
dc.contributor.author Humphrey Wanzira
dc.contributor.author Briggs J
dc.contributor.author Moses R. Kamya
dc.contributor.author Joaniter I. Nankabirwa
dc.contributor.author Grant Dorsey
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-11T13:52:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-11T13:52:06Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49855
dc.description.abstract Abstract; Background: Malaria surveillance is critical for monitoring changes in malaria morbidity over time. National Malaria Control Programs often rely on surrogate measures of malaria incidence, including the test positivity rate (TPR) and total laboratory confirmed cases of malaria (TCM), to monitor trends in malaria morbidity. However, there are limited data on the accuracy of TPR and TCM for predicting temporal changes in malaria incidence, especially in high burden settings.Methods: This study leveraged data from 5 malaria reference centers (MRCs) located in high burden settings over a 15-month period from November 2018 through January 2020 as part of an enhanced health facility-based surveillance system established in Uganda. Individual level data were collected from all outpatients including demographics, laboratory test results, and village of residence. Estimates of malaria incidence were derived from catchment areas around the MRCs. Temporal relationships between monthly aggregate measures of TPR and TCM relative to estimates of malaria incidence were examined using linear and exponential regression models. Results: A total of 149,739 outpatient visits to the 5 MRCs were recorded. Overall, malaria was suspected in 73.4% of visits, 99.1% of patients with suspected malaria received a diagnostic test, and 69.7% of those tested for malaria were positive. Temporal correlations between monthly measures of TPR and malaria incidence using linear and exponential regression models were relatively poor, with small changes in TPR frequently associated with large changes in malaria incidence. Linear regression models of temporal changes in TCM provided the most parsimonious and accurate predictor of changes in malaria incidence, with adjusted R2 values ranging from 0.81 to 0.98 across the 5 MRCs. However, the slope of the regression lines indicating the change in malaria incidence per unit change in TCM varied from 0.57 to 2.13 across the 5 MRCs, and when combining data across all 5 sites, the R2 value reduced to 0.38. Conclusions: In high malaria burden areas of Uganda, site-specific temporal changes in TCM had a strong linear relationship with malaria incidence and were a more useful metric than TPR. However, caution should be taken when comparing changes in TCM across sites.
dc.publisher Research Square
dc.title Relationships between test positivity rate, total laboratory confirmed cases of malaria, and malaria incidence in high burden settings of Uganda: An ecological analysis
dc.type Preprint
dc.identifier.doi 10.21203/rs.3.rs-65588/v3
dc.identifier.mag 3109101659
dc.identifier.lens 170-148-553-131-04X
dc.subject.lens-fields Malaria
dc.subject.lens-fields Malaria incidence
dc.subject.lens-fields Ecological analysis
dc.subject.lens-fields Medicine
dc.subject.lens-fields Environmental health


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account