combine@alvar.ug

Status of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Healthcare Facilities in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area, Uganda.

Status of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Healthcare Facilities in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area, Uganda.

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Denis Kayiwa
dc.contributor.author Richard K. Mugambe
dc.contributor.author Jane Sembuche Mselle
dc.contributor.author John Bosco Isunju
dc.contributor.author John C. Ssempebwa
dc.contributor.author Solomon Tsebeni Wafula
dc.contributor.author Rawlance Ndejjo
dc.contributor.author Winnie K Kansiime
dc.contributor.author Aisha Nalugya
dc.contributor.author Brenda Wagaba
dc.contributor.author Jude. B. Zziwa
dc.contributor.author Constance Bwire
dc.contributor.author Esther Buregyeya
dc.contributor.author Martin Othieno Radooli
dc.contributor.author Ceaser Kimbugwe
dc.contributor.author Emily Namanya
dc.contributor.author Najib Lukooya Bateganya
dc.contributor.author Joanne A. McGriff
dc.contributor.author Yuke Wang
dc.contributor.author Tonny Ssekamatte
dc.contributor.author Yakubu Habib
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-11T13:51:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-11T13:51:58Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49754
dc.description.abstract Abstract; Background: Improved Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) services in Health Care Facilities (HCFs) is of significant public health importance. It is associated with a reduction in the transmission of hospital acquired infections (HAIs), increased trust and uptake of healthcare services, cost saving from infections averted, increased efficiency and improved staff morale. Despite these benefits, there is limited evidence on the status of WASH in HCFs in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area (GKMA). This study assessed the status of WASH within HCFs in the GKMA in order to inform policy and WASH programming.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 60 HCFs. The status of WASH in the study facilities was assessed using a validated WASH Conditions (WASHCon) tool comprising of structured interviews, HCF observations and microbial water quality analysis. Data were analysed using Stata 14 software and R software. The relationships between WASH status and HCF characteristics were assessed using Fishers’ exact tests.Results: Overall, 84.5% (49/58) and 12.1% (7/58) of HCFs had limited and basic WASH status respectively. About 48.3% (28/58) had a limited water supply status, 84.5% (49/58) had limited sanitation status, 50.0% (29/58) had limited environmental cleanliness status, 56.9% (33/58) had limited hand hygiene status and 51.7% (30/58) had limited waste management status. Overall, there were significant differences in water supply status by ownership of the HCF and level of HCF. There was a significant statistical difference in WASH status between public and private not for profit facilities (p = 0.021). A significant difference was also observed in WASH status between hospitals and lower levels HCFs (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Majority of the HCFs in the GKMA had limited access to all WASH service domains i.e. water supply, sanitation, hand hygiene, environmental cleanliness and healthcare waste management. We recommend deliberate increased investments in WASH for healthcare services, especially for sanitation and hand hygiene provisions which were in the poorest state. Improvements in WASH conditions will not only minimize the risk of transmission of HAIs but also associated costs.
dc.publisher Research Square
dc.title Status of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Healthcare Facilities in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area, Uganda.
dc.type Preprint
dc.identifier.doi 10.21203/rs.3.rs-18740/v1
dc.identifier.lens 125-667-417-396-337


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account