combine@alvar.ug

Developing a Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Patient Preferences in Resource-Limited Settings: a Six-Step Guide

Developing a Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Patient Preferences in Resource-Limited Settings: a Six-Step Guide

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Sarah E Moor
dc.contributor.author Andrew K. Tusubira
dc.contributor.author Ann R. Akiteng
dc.contributor.author Evelyn Hsieh
dc.contributor.author Christine Ngaruiya
dc.contributor.author Tracy L. Rabin
dc.contributor.author Nicola L. Hawley
dc.contributor.author Mari Armstrong-Hough
dc.contributor.author Rachel Nugent
dc.contributor.author Robert Kalyesubula
dc.contributor.author Christine Nalwadda
dc.contributor.author Isaac Ssinabulya
dc.contributor.author Jeremy I. Schwartz
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-11T13:51:38Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-11T13:51:38Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49372
dc.description.abstract A discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a method to quantify preferences for goods and services in a population. Participants are asked to choose between sets of 2 hypothetical scenarios that differ in terms of particular characteristics. Their selections reveal the relative importance of each "attribute", or characteristic, and the extent to which people consider trade-offs between characteristics. DCEs are increasingly used in healthcare and public health settings as they can inform the design of health-related interventions to achieve maximum impact. Specific efforts must be made in the development process to ensure relevance of DCEs to the communities in which they are administered. Herein, we build upon gaps in the prior literature by offering researchers a step-by-step process to guide DCE development for resource-limited settings, including detailed methodological considerations for each step and a specific actionable approach that we hope will simplify the process for other researchers. We present the 6 steps we followed to develop a DCE to evaluate patient preferences for management of hypertension and diabetes in rural Uganda. These steps are: 1) formative work; 2) attribute selection; 3) attribute level selection; 4) DCE design selection; 5) determination of attribute level combinations; and 6) assessment and enhancement of tool comprehensibility. We describe each of these steps in detail to ease the development process for researchers looking to develop locally contextualized, end-user-centric health interventions.
dc.publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
dc.title Developing a Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Patient Preferences in Resource-Limited Settings: a Six-Step Guide
dc.type Preprint
dc.identifier.doi 10.1101/2020.10.05.20206557
dc.identifier.mag 3091947212
dc.identifier.lens 000-241-543-927-302
dc.subject.lens-fields Public health
dc.subject.lens-fields Feature selection
dc.subject.lens-fields Health care
dc.subject.lens-fields Goods and services
dc.subject.lens-fields Psychological intervention
dc.subject.lens-fields Population
dc.subject.lens-fields Discrete choice experiment
dc.subject.lens-fields Computer science
dc.subject.lens-fields Formative assessment
dc.subject.lens-fields Knowledge management


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account