combine@alvar.ug

Comparative Study Of Students‘ Approaches And Strategies To Learning: Implications For Counselling

Comparative Study Of Students‘ Approaches And Strategies To Learning: Implications For Counselling

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Fatimah Y. Tijani
dc.contributor.author O. Grace Abimbola
dc.contributor.author Namusoke Jane
dc.contributor.author T.S Adeyemi
dc.contributor.author Emmanuel A Egbekunle
dc.contributor.author E.O Kehinde
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-10T11:55:51Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-10T11:55:51Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.issn 18577881
dc.identifier.issn 18577431
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49241
dc.description.abstract The researchers compared students’ approaches and strategies to learning in two African countries viz.; Nigeria and Uganda. Using a descriptive survey, fifty students, who were enrolled in the year 2012/2013 in guidance and counselling and computer science respectively, were sampled from the population. The students offered an ICT course separately in 200 level in the different institutions. The instrument used was the Approaches to study skills inventory (ASSIST) and the three hypotheses were postulated and tested. The results of the t-test analysis show that the null hypothesis was not statistically significant when using the strategic approach (t = 1.037, 1.056); p > .05 and the deep approach to learning of students in Nigeria and Uganda (t = -0.278, -0.279); p > .05. The second hypotheses revealed a no statistically significant difference in the Nigerian and Ugandan preferences for different types of courses in teaching and learning while the third hypothesis shows a significant correlation between a deep approach to learning and learning that supports understanding (r=.407; p <.001). It is recommended that lecturers need to accommodate their students’ individual differences in the teaching and learning process considering that most of the classes in higher institutions of learning are large for the prevalent part. Additionally, discussions on possible implications for counselling are discussed in the paper.
dc.publisher European Scientific Institute, ESI
dc.relation.ispartof European Scientific Journal, ESJ
dc.title Comparative Study Of Students‘ Approaches And Strategies To Learning: Implications For Counselling
dc.type journal article
dc.identifier.doi 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n16p268
dc.identifier.mag 2467604525
dc.identifier.lens 088-951-523-577-404
dc.identifier.volume 12
dc.identifier.issue 16
dc.identifier.spage 268
dc.subject.lens-fields Study skills
dc.subject.lens-fields Mathematics education
dc.subject.lens-fields Null hypothesis
dc.subject.lens-fields Population
dc.subject.lens-fields Strategic approach
dc.subject.lens-fields Descriptive survey
dc.subject.lens-fields Significant difference
dc.subject.lens-fields Information and Communications Technology
dc.subject.lens-fields Social psychology


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account