combine@alvar.ug

Experience of implementing new mental health indicators within information systems in six low- and middle-income countries.

Experience of implementing new mental health indicators within information systems in six low- and middle-income countries.

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Shalini Ahuja
dc.contributor.author Charlotte Hanlon
dc.contributor.author Dan Chisholm
dc.contributor.author Maya Semrau
dc.contributor.author Dristy Gurung
dc.contributor.author Jibril Abdulmalik
dc.contributor.author James Mugisha
dc.contributor.author Ntokozo Mntambo
dc.contributor.author Fred Kigozi
dc.contributor.author Inge Petersen
dc.contributor.author Rahul Shidhaye
dc.contributor.author Nawaraj Upadhaya
dc.contributor.author Crick Lund
dc.contributor.author Sara Evans-Lacko
dc.contributor.author Graham Thornicroft
dc.contributor.author Oye Gureje
dc.contributor.author Mark J. D. Jordans
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.issn 20564724
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49135
dc.description.abstract Background Successful scale-up of integrated primary mental healthcare requires routine monitoring of key programme performance indicators. A consensus set of mental health indicators has been proposed but evidence on their use in routine settings is lacking. Aims To assess the acceptability, feasibility, perceived costs and sustainability of implementing indicators relating to integrated mental health service coverage in six South Asian (India, Nepal) and sub-Saharan African countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda). Method A qualitative study using semi-structured key informant interviews ( n = 128) was conducted. The ‘Performance of Routine Information Systems’ framework served as the basis for a coding framework covering three main categories related to the performance of new tools introduced to collect data on mental health indicators: (1) technical; (2) organisation; and (3) behavioural determinants. Results Most mental health indicators were deemed relevant and potentially useful for improving care, and therefore acceptable to end users. Exceptions were indicators on functionality, cost and severity. The simplicity of the data-capturing formats contributed to the feasibility of using forms to generate data on mental health indicators. Health workers reported increasing confidence in their capacity to record the mental health data and minimal additional cost to initiate mental health reporting. However, overstretched primary care staff and the time-consuming reporting process affected perceived sustainability. Conclusions Use of the newly developed, contextually appropriate mental health indicators in health facilities providing primary care services was seen largely to be feasible in the six Emerald countries, mainly because of the simplicity of the forms and continued support in the design and implementation stage. However, approaches to implementation of new forms generating data on mental health indicators need to be customised to the specific health system context of different countries. Further work is needed to identify ways to utilise mental health data to monitor and improve the quality of mental health services. Declaration of interest None.
dc.description.sponsorship Medical Research Council (MR/S001255/1) United Kingdom
dc.publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
dc.relation.ispartof BJPsych open
dc.subject Mental healthcare
dc.subject health information system
dc.subject indicators
dc.subject low- and middle-income settings
dc.subject primary healthcare
dc.title Experience of implementing new mental health indicators within information systems in six low- and middle-income countries.
dc.type journal article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1192/bjo.2019.29
dc.identifier.pmid 31530321
dc.identifier.mag 2950521983
dc.identifier.pmc PMC6688459
dc.identifier.lens 051-568-535-668-819
dc.identifier.volume 5
dc.identifier.issue 5
dc.identifier.spage e71
dc.subject.lens-fields Mental health
dc.subject.lens-fields Performance indicator
dc.subject.lens-fields Declaration
dc.subject.lens-fields Business
dc.subject.lens-fields Health informatics
dc.subject.lens-fields Nursing
dc.subject.lens-fields Information system
dc.subject.lens-fields Qualitative research
dc.subject.lens-fields Sustainability
dc.subject.lens-fields End user


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account