combine@alvar.ug

Perceptions attitude and use of family planning services in post conflict Gulu district northern Uganda.

Perceptions attitude and use of family planning services in post conflict Gulu district northern Uganda.

Show simple record

dc.contributor.author Christopher Garimoi Orach
dc.contributor.author George Otim
dc.contributor.author Juliet Faith Aporomon
dc.contributor.author Richard Amone
dc.contributor.author Stephen Acellam Okello
dc.contributor.author Beatrice Odongkara
dc.contributor.author Henry Komakech
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 17521505
dc.identifier.uri https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49132
dc.description.abstract Northern Uganda was severely affected by two decades of civil war that led to the displacement and encampment of an estimated 1.6 million inhabitants. The objective of this study was to assess community perspectives, attitude and factors that influence use of family planning (FP) services in post conflict Gulu district. We conducted a cross sectional study using multistage sampling technique. All three counties in the district were purposely selected. Two sub-counties per county and four parishes per sub-county were randomly selected. A total of 24 parishes (clusters) and 21 adult heads of households per cluster were randomly selected and interviewed. In total, 500 adults 117 males (23.4 %) and 383 females (76.6 %) were interviewed. We conducted 8 focus group discussions and 6 key informant interviews with family planning managers and service providers. Quantitative data were entered in EPI data and analyzed using STATA version 12. Qualitative data were analyzed manually using thematic content analysis. Contraceptive prevalence rate was 47.5 %. Communities perceive FP as acceptable, beneficial and geographically, temporally and financially accessible. Factors associated with FP use included age 26–35 years (AOR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.18-3.10, p = 0.008), and 36–45 years (AOR 2.27, 95 % CI 1.21-4.25, p = 0.010), rural residence (AOR = 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.71, p = 0.001), cohabitation (AOR = 2.77, 95 % CI 1.15-6.65, p = 0.023), and being a farmer (AOR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35-0.97, p = 0.037). The main reason for non-use of family planning was fear of side effects 88.2 %. The main source of FP services was government health facilities 94.2 %. Use of family planning is relatively high and communities view FP services as acceptable, beneficial and accessible. Family planning use is mainly determined by age, residence, occupation and marital status. Fear of side effects is the main impediment to FP use. There is need to increase awareness and effectively manage side effects of family planning in the settings.
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartof Conflict and health
dc.subject Accessibility
dc.subject Attitudes
dc.subject Family planning services
dc.subject Northern Uganda
dc.subject Perceptions
dc.subject Post conflict
dc.subject Utilization
dc.title Perceptions attitude and use of family planning services in post conflict Gulu district northern Uganda.
dc.type journal article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s13031-015-0050-9
dc.identifier.pmid 26265935
dc.identifier.mag 1504026401
dc.identifier.pmc PMC4531537
dc.identifier.lens 050-872-418-323-74X
dc.identifier.volume 9
dc.identifier.issue 1
dc.identifier.spage 24
dc.identifier.epage 24
dc.subject.lens-fields Public health
dc.subject.lens-fields Cross-sectional study
dc.subject.lens-fields Residence
dc.subject.lens-fields Family planning
dc.subject.lens-fields Cohabitation
dc.subject.lens-fields Health services research
dc.subject.lens-fields Marital status
dc.subject.lens-fields Focus group
dc.subject.lens-fields Medicine
dc.subject.lens-fields Environmental health


This record appears in the collections of the following institution(s)

Show simple record

Search Entire Database


Browse

My Account