dc.contributor.author | H. Millward | |
dc.contributor.author | V. P. Ojwang | |
dc.contributor.author | J. A. Carter | |
dc.contributor.author | Sally Hartley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-10T11:55:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 09687599 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 13600508 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49124 | |
dc.description.abstract | Uganda has made much progress towards including disabled people in its mainstream development, particularly in the political agenda. The exact process by which this has been achieved and the relationship between this and international guidelines and legislation are not known. This study undertakes to examine this from two specific perspectives: (1) How do international documents relevant to disabled people relate to national legislation in Uganda? (2) What can this comparison, together with the perceptions of stakeholders, tell us about how the legislation and services could improve? International legislation and Ugandan legislation is reviewed and compared. Data from 5 semi‐structured key informant interviews and 6 focus group discussions involving a total of 38 people are collected and analysed. The themes arising from the data are related to the documents, legislation, policies and other relevant literature. The results examine the barriers to service provision; the role of change; the importance of re... | |
dc.publisher | Informa UK Limited | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Disability & Society | |
dc.title | International guidelines and the inclusion of disabled people. The Ugandan story | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09687590500059101 | |
dc.identifier.mag | 2108761404 | |
dc.identifier.lens | 048-659-593-258-231 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
dc.identifier.spage | 153 | |
dc.identifier.epage | 167 | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Political science | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Legislation | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Mainstream | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Political agenda | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Service provision | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Disabled people | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Key informants | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Public relations | |
dc.subject.lens-fields | Focus group |
|