dc.contributor.author |
Gørill Haugan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jorunn Drageset |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Beate André |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kamile Kukulu |
|
dc.contributor.author |
James Mugisha |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Britt Karin Støen Utvær |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-01-10T11:55:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-01-10T11:55:38Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
14777525 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://combine.alvar.ug/handle/1/49041 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Well-adapted and validated quality-of-life measurement models for the nursing home population are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the psychometrical properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire among cognitively intact nursing home residents. The research question addressed evidence related to the dimensionality, reliability and construct validity, all of which considered interrelated measurement properties. Cross-sectional data were collected during 2017–2018, in 27 nursing homes representing four different Norwegian municipalities, located in Western and Mid-Norway. The total sample comprised 188 of 204 (92% response rate) long-term nursing home residents who met the inclusion criteria: (1) municipality authority’s decision of long-term nursing home care; (2) residential time 3 months or longer; (3) informed consent competency recognized by responsible doctor and nurse; and (4) capable of being interviewed. Principal component analysis and confirmative factor analyses indicated a unidimensional solution. Five of the original 13 items showed low reliability and validity; excluding these items revealed a good model fit for the one-dimensional 8-items measurement model, showing good internal consistency and validity for these 8 items. Five out of the 13 original items were not high-quality indicators of quality-of-life showing low reliability and validity in this nursing home population. Significant factor loadings, goodness-of-fit indices and significant correlations in the expected directions with the selected constructs (anxiety, depression, self-transcendence, meaning-in-life, nurse-patient interaction, and joy-of-life) supported the psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire. Exploring the essence of quality-of-life when residing in a nursing home is highly warranted, followed by development and validation of new tools assessing quality-of-life in this population. Such knowledge and well-adapted scales for the nursing home population are beneficial and important for the further development of care quality in nursing homes, and consequently for quality-of-life and wellbeing in this population. |
|
dc.description.sponsorship |
Norges Forskningsråd (238331) |
|
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Health and quality of life outcomes |
|
dc.subject |
Factor analysis |
|
dc.subject |
Nursing home care |
|
dc.subject |
Nursing home residents |
|
dc.subject |
OPQoL-brief questionnaire |
|
dc.subject |
Psychometric properties |
|
dc.subject |
Quality of life |
|
dc.subject |
Wellbeing |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Aged |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Aged, 80 and over |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Cross-Sectional Studies |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Factor Analysis, Statistical |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Female |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Geriatric Assessment/methods |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Homes for the Aged |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Humans |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Male |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Norway |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Nursing Homes |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Principal Component Analysis |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Psychometrics |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Quality of Life/psychology |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Reproducibility of Results |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Surveys and Questionnaires/standards |
|
dc.title |
Assessing quality of life in older adults: psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire in a nursing home population |
|
dc.type |
journal article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1186/s12955-019-1245-3 |
|
dc.identifier.pmid |
31898546 |
|
dc.identifier.mag |
2997660832 |
|
dc.identifier.pmc |
PMC6941243 |
|
dc.identifier.lens |
024-673-847-624-490 |
|
dc.identifier.volume |
18 |
|
dc.identifier.issue |
1 |
|
dc.identifier.spage |
1 |
|
dc.identifier.epage |
14 |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Competence (human resources) |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Quality of life |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Psychology |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Response rate (survey) |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Population |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Construct validity |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Anxiety |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Norwegian |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Informed consent |
|
dc.subject.lens-fields |
Gerontology |
|